| Author |
Message |
|
2008/03/11 00:16
|
|
|
garrett williams
Joined: 2008/02/25
Messages: 3
Offline
|
|
|
|
I would like to represent an Anonymous unions in my class.
class fred
{
public:
union
{
int a;
float b;
};
};
This is completely legal in C++ I really would like to know how to represent it in VP.
Thanks for your time.
|
Globals are bad. |
|
|
|
 |
| |
|
|
2008/03/11 12:06
|
|
|
Jick
Joined: 2005/04/29
Messages: 2880
Offline
|
|
|
|
Hi Garrett,
As I know UML cannot represent Anonymous unions. Do you see this available in other products? Any suggestions? We will definitely consider your request.
Best regards,
Jick
|
Visual Paradigm International Ltd.
http://www.visual-paradigm.com
Build Quality Applications Faster, Better and Cheaper |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
2008/03/11 22:01
|
|
|
garrett williams
Joined: 2008/02/25
Messages: 3
Offline
|
|
|
|
I was thinking that there would be some way to configure the template to recognize the union key word and do the appropriate code.
I have always been confused by the lack of anonymous unions in UML
|
Globals are bad. |
|
|
|
|
| |
