| Author |
Message |
|
2007/07/03 17:04
|
|
|
arturK
Joined: 2006/11/23
Messages: 87
Offline
|
|
|
|
Hello,
Would it be posible to extend Model assignent to inclde proceses and subprocesses ?
Kind regards, Artur
|
|
|
|
 |
| |
|
2007/07/04 16:36
|
|
|
Jick
Joined: 2005/04/29
Messages: 2881
Offline
|
|
|
|
Hi arturK,
Do you mean Model in Requirement Diagram?
Best regards,
Jick
|
Visual Paradigm International Ltd.
http://www.visual-paradigm.com
Build Quality Applications Faster, Better and Cheaper |
|
|
|
 |
| |
|
2007/07/04 16:43
|
|
|
arturK
Joined: 2006/11/23
Messages: 87
Offline
|
|
|
|
Hello Jick,
Yes, I meant Model element available on Requiremens Diagram. As we're taling about requirements, do you have in plans support for business rules ? We currently use requirements stereotyped with business rule, however it is a workaround.
Kind regards, Artur
|
|
|
|
 |
| |
|
2007/07/05 08:57
|
|
|
Jick
Joined: 2005/04/29
Messages: 2881
Offline
|
|
|
|
Hi arturK,
I will discuss this with our engineers.
Best regards,
Jick
|
Visual Paradigm International Ltd.
http://www.visual-paradigm.com
Build Quality Applications Faster, Better and Cheaper |
|
|
|
 |
| |
|
2007/07/05 15:06
|
|
|
arturK
Joined: 2006/11/23
Messages: 87
Offline
|
|
|
|
Thank you, Jick. I look forward to hear from you.
Kind regards, Artur
|
|
|
|
 |
| |
|
2007/07/05 16:25
|
|
|
Jick
Joined: 2005/04/29
Messages: 2881
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| |
|
2007/07/06 21:21
|
|
|
arturK
Joined: 2006/11/23
Messages: 87
Offline
|
|
|
|
Hi Jick,
Thank you for your quick response. I have just installed the patch and indeed I can currently use sub-processes to be assigned to Model. However I cannot use processes. Would it be a big problem to suport them ?
Regards, Artur
|
|
|
|
 |
| |
|
2007/07/07 09:42
|
|
|
Jick
Joined: 2005/04/29
Messages: 2881
Offline
|
|
|
|
Hi Artur,
I thought that by "Process" you meant the Pool in BPD. Didn't you mean Pool? We already supported Task and Sub-process, which are sometimes known as "Process".
Best regards,
Jick
|
Visual Paradigm International Ltd.
http://www.visual-paradigm.com
Build Quality Applications Faster, Better and Cheaper |
|
|
|
 |
| |
|
2007/07/07 17:25
|
|
|
arturK
Joined: 2006/11/23
Messages: 87
Offline
|
|
|
|
Hi Jick,
The process, that I meant, is one of the attributes (named Process) of the Pool. The Pool, to me, is a "place" where the process is happening. So having a possibility to assign the process to the model could be in some cases more appropriate for "satisfy" relationship as it would emphasize what acivity will be responsible for carrying out the functionality represented by the requirement, not who does it.
What do you thik about this ?
Kind regards, Artur
|
|
|
|
 |
| |
|
2007/07/17 18:02
|
|
|
Jick
Joined: 2005/04/29
Messages: 2881
Offline
|
|
|
|
Hi arturK,
Actually, Process is a property. Currently we just support reference to model but not property level. Since one process can only be contained by one pool, you can simply point to the Pool instead of the Process.
Finally, we would like to know your purpose of doing this. Let say, is it for report generation?
Best regards,
Jick
|
Visual Paradigm International Ltd.
http://www.visual-paradigm.com
Build Quality Applications Faster, Better and Cheaper |
|
|
|
 |
| |
|
2007/07/17 18:34
|
|
|
arturK
Joined: 2006/11/23
Messages: 87
Offline
|
|
|
|
Hi Jick,
Thank you for you anwer. The purpose is simple "purity" of the approach. Speaking more preisely, we are using the concept of business requirements, connecting processes with elements of the IT architecture. One of these elements are processes being implemented in BPM system (i.e. webMethods, BizTalk). Thus we'd like to have posibility to connect Requirement to modele element representing the process that would be then finaly designed in separate tool.
Regards, Artur
|
|
|
|
 |
| |
|
2007/07/20 12:01
|
|
|
Jick
Joined: 2005/04/29
Messages: 2881
Offline
|
|
|
|
HI Artur,
We will support your need. Will contact you once the patch has been ready.
Best regards,
Jick
|
Visual Paradigm International Ltd.
http://www.visual-paradigm.com
Build Quality Applications Faster, Better and Cheaper |
|
|
|
 |
| |
|
2007/07/20 13:55
|
|
|
arturK
Joined: 2006/11/23
Messages: 87
Offline
|
|
|
|
Thank you, Jick !
Regards, Artur
|
|
|
|
 |
| |
|
2007/07/20 14:46
|
|
|
Jick
Joined: 2005/04/29
Messages: 2881
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| |
|
2007/07/21 18:45
|
|
|
Jick
Joined: 2005/04/29
Messages: 2881
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| |