<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the topic "UML Understanding problems"]]></title>
		<link>http://forums.visual-paradigm.com/posts/9.html</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the topic "UML Understanding problems"]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>UML Understanding problems</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ hi<br> i am facing  problems in understanding some isuues in uml desiging.<br> 1) when i design a program i dont know exactly what do the program need to  run properly . and sometimes i need to add a variable in oreder to make a certain method to work properly. the Question is how can i avoid this thing from the beginning ?<br> 2)i found some  details in the code  not to be mentioned in the uml design like if stetements and some expressions and even some methods and objects like main() and actionlistener  . But i coudnt realize the fundamental of this .<br> 3)when i need a constructer  ? i still dont understand why some programs have a constructor  .You can use what ever you want of methods without constructor what is the need for constructor sometimes ?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.visual-paradigm.com/posts/2078#16584.html</guid>
				<link>http://forums.visual-paradigm.com/posts/2078#16584.html</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:54:07]]></pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ anUMLTrainer]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:UML Understanding problems</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Hi,<br> <br> I think you are not really talking about UML modelling but about programming in general and <br> about object oriented programming.<br> <br> 1) I think there is no simple solution. Modelling your system first using UML for instance <br> might help you not to forget things... maybe not. It is a good question!<br> <br> 2) UML models never show the specific implementations of things (methods in particular). <br> It is not what they are made for.<br> <br> 3) You should know that if you haven't defined a constructor yourself there always exists a <br> default constructor. The question is not whether a constructor is useful or not, a constructor<br> is mandatory. It is invoked each time a class is being instanciated.<br> <br> Regards.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.visual-paradigm.com/posts/2078#17186.html</guid>
				<link>http://forums.visual-paradigm.com/posts/2078#17186.html</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 5 May 2007 23:26:36]]></pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Anonymous]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>