<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the topic "Source files from Class containment"]]></title>
		<link>http://forums.visual-paradigm.com/posts/9.html</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the topic "Source files from Class containment"]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>Source files from Class containment</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Hi,<br> <br> I'm not sure if it's the right forum to ask this open question, please move it to a better place if any:<br> <br> In UML you can have the definition of a Class contained in another class.<br> For my point of view, it's happens when an instance of the sub-class cannot exist without an instance of the containing Class. <br> i.e. a Line of Invoice cannot exists without an Invoice.<br> <br> So in such case I think the code of those classes can be in the same source file. Because there is no advantage to separate them in two files.<br> I do that in PHP (and I think also in C++ but it's a long time ago and I'm not sure).<br> Do you think it's a good idea ?<br> <br> Thanks for your comments,<br> Cheers,<br> Guillaume]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.visual-paradigm.com/posts/2296#18335.html</guid>
				<link>http://forums.visual-paradigm.com/posts/2296#18335.html</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 6 Jul 2007 12:17:59]]></pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Guillaume]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>