<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the topic "independant subprocesses and bpel"]]></title>
		<link>http://forums.visual-paradigm.com/posts/43.html</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the topic "independant subprocesses and bpel"]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>independant subprocesses and bpel</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Hi!<br> I've got a problem concerning the BPEL creation (BPVA 2.0 sp2):<br> Everything works fine, as long as I don't use independent sub-processes. According to the BPMN specification it is to possible to match independent sub-processes to BPEL (they should be handled as seperate processes, if the referenced process and diagram are given)<br> Unfortunately I always receive the following error messages: <br> [ERROR] <BusinessProcessDiagram> Process: Must contains only one no income notation<br> [ERROR] <BusinessProcessDiagram> Process: Must contains only one no outcome notation<br> during the creation of the BPEL. <br> If I replace the the independent sub-process with an embedded one, everything works just fine. <br> I've tried a lot of things but I couldn't figure out what I did wrong. <br> <br> Could anyone please help me with that problem?<br> If possible, post a simple example where it works.<br> <br> Best Regards<br> Bernhard<br> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.visual-paradigm.com/posts/2385#18800.html</guid>
				<link>http://forums.visual-paradigm.com/posts/2385#18800.html</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 7 Aug 2007 21:22:29]]></pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Bernhard Schmaldienst]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:independant subprocesses and bpel</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Hi Bernhard,<br> <br> Thank you for your post. We will investigate the problem and come back to you as soon as possible.<br> <br> Best regards,<br> Jick]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.visual-paradigm.com/posts/2385#18806.html</guid>
				<link>http://forums.visual-paradigm.com/posts/2385#18806.html</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 8 Aug 2007 10:15:08]]></pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Jick]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:independant subprocesses and bpel</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Dear Jick!<br> I don't receive that error message for independent sub-processes any more, but the mapping to BPEL still doesn't work the way it is mentionend in the OMG-BPMN-specification. (an invoke activity should be created).<br> <br> Is there any document, describing in detail how the mapping between BPVA BPMN-objects (respectivly their properties) and BPEL works, because it seems to me as if the mapping doesn't work exactly as specified in the specification.<br> e.g.: Start Events with Trigger=Message should map to a receive activity, properties of a task should map to variable<br> Maybe it's just necessary to follow another approach to gain specific results in BPEL. <br> The video example on the homepage and the following link provided me with some initial hints, but didn't make it all clear to me (<a href="http://resource.visual-paradigm.com/vpsuite2.3sp2/generate_bpel_for_oracle.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://resource.visual-paradigm.com/vpsuite2.3sp2/generate_bpel_for_oracle.html</a>)<br> So any further information would help me a lot.<br> <br> Best regards<br> Bernhard<br> <br> <br> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.visual-paradigm.com/posts/2385#18824.html</guid>
				<link>http://forums.visual-paradigm.com/posts/2385#18824.html</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 9 Aug 2007 20:29:50]]></pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Bernhard Schmaldienst]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>