I would like to represent an Anonymous unions in my class.
class fred
{
public:
union
{
int a;
float b;
};
};
This is completely legal in C++ I really would like to know how to represent it in VP.
Thanks for your time.
I would like to represent an Anonymous unions in my class.
class fred
{
public:
union
{
int a;
float b;
};
};
This is completely legal in C++ I really would like to know how to represent it in VP.
Thanks for your time.
Hi Garrett,
As I know UML cannot represent Anonymous unions. Do you see this available in other products? Any suggestions? We will definitely consider your request.
Best regards,
Jick
I was thinking that there would be some way to configure the template to recognize the union key word and do the appropriate code.
I have always been confused by the lack of anonymous unions in UML