This is a quick suggestion for a bug/feature in the ORM code generator.
When an ORM class is set as “Abstract” (in the general tab of the class specification), the generated ORM code does not reflect this. I mean, the class is left as “public class”.
This later can lend to compilation errors if you set a class operation as “abstract”. This time the operation (method) is correctly marked as abstract, and the compiler tells you that a “abstract method defined inside not abstract class” :oops: not good…
I have not tried the full code generator because I’m only evaluating the DB-VA Professional (or NET) edition, maybe this one builds the code with that setting, but also with ORM code? :?
So, my question is: Is it possible to put this “abstract” thing into this version? Or specifically, is it a bug not to include this keyword :roll: ? or a feature left to the upper category product 8) ?
You are welcome. We always want is to fix the bugs as soon as possible, not only to increase the product quality, but also to reduce the impact on our end users. At the same time, we welcome any comments and suggestions. We will consider seriously. In fact, many of our features were developed due to users’ requests.
Therefore, please do not hesitate to let us know if you’ve found any problems or have any suggestions. We appreciate all that you have contributed!
[quote=Jick]We always want is to fix the bugs as soon as possible, not only to increase the product quality, but also to reduce the impact on our end users. At the same time, we welcome any comments and suggestions. We will consider seriously. In fact, many of our features were developed due to users’ requests.
Therefore, please do not hesitate to let us know if you’ve found any problems or have any suggestions. We appreciate all that you have contributed![/quote]
Well, I feel better now I had a strange feeling about you were my employees, just doing whatever I said
But now, seriously, I understand what you said. I’m using this forum because I found it to be an excellent communication channel between end users and developers (and that is mainly thanks to you, Jick).
Anyway, I hope you do not get on your nerves while reading some of my looong posts :lol:
I agree with you. We’ve collected lots of valuable feedback from our user using this forum. We will do our best to make our products and services better. Appreciate your feedback!!!